| Naval War College (U.S.) - International law - 1904 - 180 pages
...beings, responsible to one another and to God. 16. ' Military necessity does not admit of crnelty—that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering...except in fight, nor of torture to extort confessions. lt does not admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the wanton devastation of a district. lt... | |
| David Wilmot Smith - Labor - 1904 - 186 pages
...persons whose destruction is incidentally unavoidable. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty. It does not admit of the use of poison in any way. It admits of deception, but disclaims acts of perfidy. It is not carried on by arms alone." He defines... | |
| United States. War Department. General Staff - 1905 - 240 pages
...supposed by the modern law of war to exist. 682. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty—that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering...maiming or wounding except in fight, nor of torture tp extort confessions. It does not admit of the use of poison in any way, nor of the wanton devastation... | |
| Industrial organization - 1907 - 832 pages
...officer understands that he must conform.' Then, too, Rule 16 of this General Order explicitly states: ' Military necessity does not admit of cruelty — that is, the infliction of suffering or for revenge, nor of maiming or wounding except in fight, nor of torture to extort confessions.'... | |
| Charles Richmond Henderson - Christian sociology - 1909 - 356 pages
...allowable. Military necessity admits of such deception as does not involve the breaking of good faith. Men who take up arms against one another in public...extort confessions. It does not admit of the use of poisons in any way, nor of the wanton devastation of a district. It admits of deception, but disdains... | |
| Charles Austin Beard - United States - 1909 - 660 pages
...persons whose destruction is incidentally unavoidable. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty. It does not admit of the use of poison in any way. It admits of deception, but disclaims acts of perfidy. It is not carried on by arms alone. . . . Every... | |
| Charles Richmond Henderson - Christian sociology - 1909 - 356 pages
...beings, responsible to one another and to God. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty—that is, the infliction of suffering for the sake of suffering or for revenge—nor of maiming or wounding except in fight, nor of torture to extort confessions. It does... | |
| Charles Leonard-Stuart - Encyclopedias and dictionaries - 1912 - 644 pages
...and of other persons whose destruction is incidentally "unavoidable" in the armeil contests of war. Military necessity does not admit of cruelty — that is, the infliction of suffering for the s:ike of suffering or for revenge, or of maiming or wounding, except in fight, nor of torture to extort... | |
| Military law - 1914 - 246 pages
...necessity doe* not admit oft— Military necessity does not admit of cruelty — that is, the infiiction of suffering for the sake- of suffering or for revenge, nor of maiming:flr wounding' except in fight, nor of 'torture to extort coafesslons. It does not admit of... | |
| |