 But the prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be a witness against himself is a prohibition of the use of physical or moral compulsion to extort communications from him, not an exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be material.  The American Year Book - Page 152edited by - 1912Full view - About this book
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1911 - 760 pages
...excluded for the same reasons. But the prohibition of n compelling a man in a criminal court to ", be y@& moral'compulsion to extort communications from him, not an exclusion of his body as evidence when it... | |
 | United States. War Department - Courts-martial and courts of inquiry - 1916 - 458 pages
...examination. — " The prohibition of the fifth amendment against compelling: " man to give evidence against himself is a prohibition of the use of physical...moral compulsion to extort communications from him and not an exclusion of his body us evidence when it is material." (Holt v. US, 218 US, 245.) In addition... | |
 | Hannis Taylor - Administrative law - 1917 - 1038 pages
...statement -inadmissible, and that it should be excluded for the same reason. But the prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be a witness...exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be material. The objection in principle would forbid a jury to look at a prisoner and compare his features with... | |
 | New York (State). Courts - Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 876 pages
...be excluded for the same reasons. But the prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be witness against himself is a prohibition of the use...exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be material. The objection in principle would forbid a jury to look at a prisoner and compare his features with... | |
 | United States - Law - 1918 - 1138 pages
...Ann. Cas. 1235, the court saying: "But the prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be witness against himself is a prohibition of the use...an exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be materiajl. The objection in principle would forbid a jury to look at a prisoner and compare his features... | |
 | United States. War Department - Courts-martial (and courts of inquiry) - 1920 - 856 pages
...EXAMINATION. — "The prohibition of the fifth amendment against compelling a man to give evidence against himself is a prohibition of the use of physical...moral compulsion to extort communications from him and not an exclusion of his body as evidence when it is material." (Holt v, US, 218 US, 245.) The following... | |
 | Elijah Nathaniel Zoline - Criminal law - 1921 - 650 pages
...of the use of physical or moral compulsion to extort communications from him; it is not extended to an exclusion of his body as evidence when it may be material, for such an objection, in principle, would forbid a jury to look at a prisoner and compare his features... | |
 | Medical jurisprudence - 1922 - 406 pages
...9 (1890); Johnson v. Comm., 115 Pa. St. 369, 373, 395, 9 Atl. 78, 81 (1886). 20 "The prohibition of compelling a man in a criminal court to be a witness...his body as evidence when it may be material."— Per Holmes, J., in Holt v. United States, 218 U S. 245, 252 (1910). See 3 Wigmore, Evidence, §§ 2263,... | |
| |
