 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - Law reports, digests, etc - 1911 - 952 pages
...testimony of a previous colloquium between the parties or of conversation or declarations at the time when it was completed, or afterwards, as it would...prejudice, possibly, of one of the parties, is rejected." (To same effect see O'Neil v. Burnley, 21 R., 936; Warland v. Secrest, 106 Ky., 711; Crane v. Williamson,... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1853 - 884 pages
...testimony of a previous colloquium between the parties, or of conversations or declarations at the time when it was completed or afterwards, as it would tend,...prejudice possibly of one of the parties, is rejected." (1 Greenl. Ev. 398.) So far, therefore, as regards Danley, or the complainant, as his representative,... | |
 | Georgia. Supreme Court - Equity - 1847 - 710 pages
...testimony of conversations, or declarations at the lime it was completed, or before, would tend often to substitute a new and different contract, for the one which was really agreed upon — and of course usually to the prejudice of the party opposed to it. . Again, it has been thought... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - Evidence (Law) - 1848 - 756 pages
...rejected; because such evidence, while deserving far less credit than the writing itself, would inevitably tend, in many instances, to substitute a new and different contract for the one really agreed upon, and would thus, without any corresponding benefit, work infinite mischief and wrong... | |
 | Bengal (India). Sadr Dīwānī ʻAdālat - Law reports, digests, etc - 1860 - 920 pages
...instrument, because such evidence, while deserving far less credit than the writing itself, would inevitably tend, in many instances, to substitute a new and different contract for the one really agreed Tipon, and would thus, without any corresponding benefit, work infinite mischief and... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - Law reports, digests, etc - 1861 - 700 pages
...testimony of a previous colloquium between the parties, or of conversation or declarations at the time when it was completed, or afterwards, as it would...prejudice, possibly, of one of the parties, is rejected." Id. 275. These are salutary rules of evidence, and should not be departed from, even in equity, unless... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 726 pages
...testimony of a previous colloquium between the parties, or of conversation or declarations at the time when it was completed, or afterwards, as it would...prejudice, possibly, of one of the parties, is rejected." (Graham v. Sadlier, 165 111. 95; Tclluride Power Co. v. Crane Co. 208 id. 218.) The rule is a familiar... | |
 | Florida. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1861 - 596 pages
...conversation of declarations at the time when it was completed or afterwards, is rejected, because it would tend, in many instances, to substitute a new and different contract for the one which was actually agreed upon. 2 Phil. Ev., 350; Boorman vs. Johnson, 12 Wendell, 573. Parol evidence is sometimes... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1864 - 1078 pages
...or afterwards, would tend, in many instances, to * substitute a new and different con- [ *3l ] tract for the one which was really agreed upon, to the prejudice, possibly, of one of the parties. The rule was introduced in early times, when the most frequent mode of ascertaining a party to a contract... | |
 | Simon Greenleaf - Evidence (Law) - 1866 - 756 pages
...testimony of a previous colloquium between the parties, or of conversation or declarations at the time when it was completed, or afterwards, as it would...the prejudice, possibly, of one of the parties, is rejected.2 In other words, as the rule is now more briefly expressed, " parol contemporaneous evidence... | |
| |
... all oral testimony of a previous colloquium between the parties, or of conversation, or declarations, at the time when it was completed, or afterwards, as it would tend in many instances to substitute a new and different contract for the one which... 
