What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
according Adams agents Alabama allowed American appears arbitrators argument armed arrived authorities avait belligerent Bermuda Britain British British Appendix called Captain carried character circumstances claims coal colony commander commission communication confederate conference consideration considered consul course crew directed documents droit due diligence duty effect equipment été être evidence fact fait fitted Florida force foreign further give given governor guerre held intended leave letter Liverpool Lord Majesty Majesty's government matter means ment Nassau navire necessary neutral obligations observe officers opinion Oreto parties persons port present President principles privateer proceedings qu'il question reason received referred regard respect responsibility rules Russell secretary Shenandoah ship statement supply taken tion treaty tribunal United vaisseau vessel violation Washington
Page 231 - Secondly, not to permit or suffer either belligerent to make use of its ports or waters as the. base of naval operations against the other, or for the purpose of the renewal or augmentation of military supplies or arms, or the recruitment of men. Thirdly, to exercise due diligence in its own ports and waters, and, as to all persons within its jurisdiction, to prevent any violation of the foregoing obligations and duties.
Page 104 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace ; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Page 272 - ... it shall be lawful for the President of the United States, or such other person as he shall have empowered for that purpose, to employ such part of the land or naval forces of the United States...
Page 56 - A neutral Government is bound — First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a Power with which it is at peace...
Page 1 - British flag, in the enhanced payments of insurance, in the prolongation of the war, and in the addition of a large sum to the cost of the war and the suppression of the rebellion...
Page 66 - Government, in order to evince its desire of strengthening the friendly relations between the two countries, and of making satisfactory provision for the future...
Page 53 - VII of the said treaty, by a majority of four voices to one, awards to the United States a sum of $15,500,000 in gold, as the indemnity to be paid by Great Britain to the United States, for the satisfaction of all the claims referred to the consideration of the tribunal, conformably to the provisions contained in Article VII of the aforesaid treaty.
Page 252 - But there is nothing in our laws, or in the law of nations, that forbids our citizens from sending armed vessels, as well as munitions of war, to foreign ports for sale. It is a commercial adventure which no nation is bound to prohibit, and which only exposes the persons engaged in it to the penalty of confiscation.
Page 106 - The said Tribunal shall first determine as to each vessel separately whether Great Britain has, by any act or omission, failed to fulfil any of the duties set forth in the foregoing three rules, or recognized by the principles of international law not inconsistent with such rules, and shall certify such fact as to each of the said vessels.